Aerodynamics, physics, engineering.Plane, bike, hiking. Can someone tell me how to take off in this thing because wep is broken I think and no matter what it wouldn't lift off the run way. What-If's are hypotheses on aircraft that where on the edge of going into service but did not. 3. In fact these things are common to other jets and props, although german-engined jets like 162/229/Yak15 … Northtrop profited The V2 was much smaller than the V3 in scale. btw, can you guys do one on the He 162 I'm kinda sad it got nerfed and would love to see if it was accurate or not.But how does this Cd0 affect an aircraft's performance? The flying wing concept was built by the Americans and they realised back in the 50's it is a bad idea and it doesn't work.

Mitten im Kalten Krieg war klar, dass es keinen Weg mehr um Lenkwaffen gab. Not even close. Kampfgeschwader 508 [KG508] LONE WOLVES -SQ1W- The Ho 229 will have to fly slow, in order to have time to properly aim, hit & evade trees. This variant was never armed, and never flew. You could learn this all in a simple 10 minute google search, instead of coming here and saying it never flew or was designed and shouting OP because it kills you. The engines overheated at the usuall climb speed(<500kmh) once you reached 3.5k or so. 5. for curiosity. So, the Americans didn't invent and decide about the flying wing concept.. Does it match real world performance? Since the Thunderjet gets an air spawn it already has all the energy it needs to get around the map quickly. Mehr als 20 000 000 Gamer also explain to me how the 229 has more drag then the 262 but a lower cd0 according to what you say here, that doesnt add up.also explain to me how the 229 has more drag then the 262 but a lower cd0 according to what you say here, that doesnt add up.Although I recommend going slightly further to the "more drag than Me262" point, by taking the CD numbers of the Me262 and Ho.229 and multiplying the number by their wing areas to get the total drag value(With units on that value too, if possible) to more solidly iterate your point there, as some people might misconstrue the CD values as total drag.(again. Until late the B2 with modern fly by wire it did not work so how does Gaijin decide that 229 is such a good aircraft? )I made sure to mention that Cd0 is just ratio of drag to wing area this time, rather than how to use it. Basic physical characteristics will always trump stories, numbers on a piece of paper etc.Note: This is not some official message from the devs or from gaijin or whatever. The flying wing concept was built by the Americans TYT [_TYT_] Published by Gaijin Network Ltd. under the exclusive license. Es ist wieder Zeit für unsere wöchentliche Ausgabe der Thunder Show! Basic physical characteristics will always trump stories, numbers on a piece of paper etc.if they were wrong then how did they get that stat using a heavier weight, the same engines, AND the same Cdo?neither one of you has posted any of the actual formulas (with data filled in for variables) showing one to be more correct then the other so there calculations are as good as yours.The Me262 has .456 total drag in comparison to the Ho229's .552 total drag, thanks to it's significantly smaller wing area. I had no clue about what you were saying except for the fact that the Ho 229 weighed more than the Me 262, had more drag, and had the same thrust thus lower performance, I really didn't understand the drag part and could you explain it in kid-friendly terms for me?The value "Cd0" is the ratio of drag to wing area of an aircraft.The 229 has a bit over half the Cd0 as the 262, and also more than twice the wing area.