I don't like to hate on WG it's hard to make everyone happy but YOU BETTER NOT MESS WITH PEOPLES MONEY!!!!!! I find it really funny that some people will go out of their way to denigrate others' issues and concerns by pointing out their own performance - which, btw in this case is server average for WR and below server WR for damage - and do it over and over again, thread after thread.

I find it really funny how everyone's been going "Hood is worthless now" when I find it more enjoyable to play Hood in her current state. Hoods AP is lacking in every way and can't do anything unless you are within 2km and have the flat side of an AFK Musashi to shoot at. Gameplay review of the British Battleship Hood on World of Warships Legends (WoWs Legends) on PS4 and XBox1. Its extremely frustrating. What I'd like to bring to your attention is the category "bulletKrupp" Krupp if you are unaware means how much armour a shell can penetrate before shattering. No problem. This is the release version of the vessel and these stats are current as of April 15th, 2018.Abandon all hope, all ye of heavy displacement. Your stick man clearly displays a body type that I can never live up to. Broadside Pensacola at 2.3km, 9 overpens through citadel (105mm).

While sigma buff is nice it still doesnt do much because if your shell shatters it doesnt do any dmg. Yeah I too have hit the citadel of enemy ships greater than 10km away, but those are exceptionally rare and you can’t RELIABLY get those citadels. Second of all, she has DFAA and by default the strongest AA at her tier among BB's, so the law of diminishing returns applies. Too often your customers are going to end up with something they wouldnt have choosen to purchase in the first place, and if a refund is even offered it is doubloons, so we cant even truly pick what we would want instead. 30:24. Sinop was already outperforming ALL T7 battleships in a recent tease by CCs. Slot 1: Auxiliary Armaments Modification 1 (), in order to improve the AA rockets' survivability. Sub_Octavian was supposed to come back to us regarding the Hood gun tests, but still hasn't. Citadeling a cruiser at point blank range? Wargaming balances with Sledge Hammers and not Scaples. [RG] I'd like to mention that part of the reason Hood's AP is worse than Warspite dragwise is that WG was also simulating the worse windscreens of Hood's AP vs that of Warspite's. Shoot a cruiser and its all overpens, shoot a battleship and its all shatters and no damage pens. Am sure the fact that she has become a "drop ship", regardless of how rare, has nothing to do with how......average....she feels. You could go on a flank and not worry about getting struck from the air.

On NA they all sail broadside in a straight line?! Let the body shaming commence. Also now if a battleship turns broadside on Hood's AP overpens the weak upper armour and shatters against the belt armour unless it's a New York or Hood's at suicide ranges.Now I could go digging through my pictures and find many more but I know someone will say that all of those were nitpicked. Hood can normally pick away the Scharn's HP, although Hoods guns are terribly unreliable when it comes to actually hitting the target. On NA they all sail broadside in a straight line?! WG even got rid of her special Defensive AA consumable instead of multiplying short-range rockets by 25 it gets the standard +100% to medium long range AA guns.

I think better guns or damage control party would have been better.what made wargaming change from givimg one of the wordt turret traverse to the best in the game, moneyI’d love to get this ship, but unfortunately the only available package on EU is £90. Which is pathetic, the Gneisenau could citadel an NC from 15km away.