The following were subordinate kings to another Holy Roman Emperor (usually, but not always, their father) for the dates specified. Originally, as in the late Roman Empire, it was used for a subordinate co-emperor or the heir apparent, and was first among the "awarded" dignities. From the reign of Theodosius I, however, most emperors chose to solidify the succession of their intended heirs by raising them to co-emperors. In practice, however, the actual administration of the Empire was always managed by the Emperor, with at most certain duties delegated to the heir. Almost all Caesars would be killed before or alongside their fathers, or at best outlive them for a matter of months, as in the case of The Tetrarchy was quickly abandoned as a system (though the four quarters of the empire survived as The title of Caesar remained in use throughout the Constantinian period, with both Constantius II himself would nominate as Caesars his two cousins The office enjoyed extensive privileges, great prestige and power. For uses in antiquity, see A junior King of the Romans was normally chosen only when the senior ruler bore the title of Emperor. When exactly did the title "emperor" become an actual title? After Charles V, Holy Roman Emperors assumed the title of "king of the Romans" at the same time as being elected emperor.

1) Ambassadors sent to Rome by foreign nations.

King of the Romans (Latin: Rex Romanorum; German: König der Römer) was a title used by Syagrius, then by the German king following his election by the princes from the time of Emperor Henry II (1014–1024) onward. In such cases, the king might retain the title "King of the Romans" for his entire reign. Caesar or Kaisar (Καῖσαρ) was a senior court title in the Byzantine Empire. The Caesar in the bible refers to Emperor sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFBury1911 ( sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFBury1911 ( sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFVerpeaux1966 ( sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFVerpeaux1966 (

With Steve West, Tom Holland, Mike Duncan, David Levene. When In the late Byzantine hierarchy, as recorded in the mid-14th century After the Fall of Constantinople, having conquered the Byzantine Empire, Mehmed took the title In diplomatic writings between the Ottomans and Austrians, the Ottoman bureaucracy was angered by their use of the Caesar title when the Ottomans saw themself as the true successors of The history of "Caesar" as an imperial title is reflected by the following monarchic titles, usually reserved for "emperor" and "empress" in many languages (note that the name Caesar, pronounced In various Romance and other languages, the imperial title was based on the Latin There have been other cases of a noun proper being turned into a title, such as However certain languages, especially Romance languages, also commonly use a "modernized" word (e.g., Translation of the name Caesar first recorded in the first book translated to Yoruba, the bible.

At some time after the ceremony, the king would, if possible, cross the Not all Kings of the Romans made this step, sometimes because of hostile relations with the Pope, or because either the pressure of business at home or warfare in Germany or Italy made it impossible for the King to make the journey. 2) Ambassadors sent from Rome to foreign nations. Many of the soldier emperors during the Despite the best efforts of these emperors, however, the granting of this title does not seem to have made succession in this chaotic period any more stable. Hence the title was more frequently awarded to second- and third-born sons, or to close and influential relatives of the Emperor: thus for example Alexio… One more question, why did the emperors adopt heirs? This article is about the title in the Holy Roman Empire.